Non-partisan information on UK attitudes to the EU before and since the EU Referendum

Do you think MPs should have voted for or against the ‘Common Market 2.0’ motion, which states that the UK should negotiate for an enhanced version of the ‘Norway’ model?

Fieldwork dates: 28 March 2019 - 29 March 2019
Data from: United Kingdom
Results from: 1 poll

Help on using the data

Download
Results for: Do you think MPs should have voted for or against the ‘Common Market 2.0’ motion, which states that the UK should negotiate for an enhanced version of the ‘Norway’ model?
Fieldwork end date
Pollster		 29 March 2019
Poll by Opinium
Definitely should have voted for the motion 12%
Probably should have voted for the motion 27%
Probably should have voted against the motion 12%
Definitely should have voted against the motion 21%
Don't know 28%

Combine responses

Choose first group:
Choose second group:
Choose third group:

Poll details

Full question wording

This week MPs voted on a range of alternative options to the prime minister's Brexit plan, to indicate which one had the most support. Now we would like to show you a summary of each motion and ask you whether you think MPs should have voted for or against each motion.
The ‘Common Market 2.0’ motion: This motion states that the UK should negotiate for an enhanced version of the “Norway” model. This would involve staying in the European Economic Area, which means the UK would continue to participate in the European single market. The motion also envisages a "comprehensive customs arrangement" with the EU until alternative arrangements are put in place and would maintain freedom of movement, albeit with conditions.

See About these data for possible variations

Related Comment

Topics

The Brexit process What should Brexit mean?