Do you think MPs should have voted for against the ‘managed no-deal’ or ‘Malthouse agreement’ motion, which states hat the UK would leave on World Trade Organisation (WTO) terms or a revised version of the current withdrawal agreement, but only after an extended transition period to December 2021 to allow time to prepare?

Poll details

• About these data (including sample size, funder, fieldwork dates, etc.)
• See all questions from this poll

Full question wording

This week MPs voted on a range of alternative options to the prime minister's Brexit plan, to indicate which one had the most support. Now we would like to show you a summary of each motion and ask you whether you think MPs should have voted for or against each motion.
The ‘managed no-deal’ or ‘Malthouse agreement’ motion: This motion states that the UK would leave on World Trade Organisation (WTO) terms or a revised version of the current withdrawal agreement, but only after an extended transition period to December 2021 to allow time to prepare. It would seek to reduce the "divorce bill" and introduce a "standstill period" with no tariffs and no new barriers to trade with the EU while talks are ongoing.

See About these data for possible variations

Topics

The Brexit process What should Brexit mean?