Do you think that cutting the amount of money available for spending on public services by about £1.25bn per week (the equivalent of about 44% of what we currently spend on the NHS) would be a price worth paying in a potential deal scenario in which the UK would face significant new tariffs and other barriers to trading with the EU, could seek to make new trade deals with the rest of the world and could opt out of some EU regulations, and could control EU immigration in the same way that it controls immigration from the rest of the world?

Poll details

• About these data (including sample size, funder, fieldwork dates, etc.)
• See all questions from this poll

Full question wording

The UK would face significant new tariffs and other barriers to trading with the EU, could seek to make new trade deals with the rest of the world and could opt out of some EU regulations.
It could control EU immigration in the same way that it controls immigration from the rest of the world.
Based on government estimates, in the long term this would cut the amount of money available for spending on public services by the equivalent of £1.25bn per week (equivalent to about 44% of what
we currently spend on the NHS).
Which of these statements is closest to your view on this possible Brexit deal?
£1.25 billion per week would be a price worth paying for this deal
£1.25 billion per week would be too high a price for this deal

See About these data for possible variations

Topics

The Brexit process