Do you think that cutting the amount of money available for spending on public services by about £260m per week (the equivalent of about 9% of what we currently spend on the NHS) would be a price worth paying in a potential deal scenario in which the UK would face some new barriers to trading with the EU, could seek to make new trade deals with the rest of the world and would still be bound by most EU regulations, and where there would be no new limits to EU immigration?

Poll details

• About these data (including sample size, funder, fieldwork dates, etc.)
• See all questions from this poll

Full question wording

The UK would face some new barriers to trading with the EU, could seek to make new trade deals with the rest of the world and would still be bound by most EU regulations.
There would be no new limits to EU immigration.
Based on government estimates, in the long term this would cut the amount of money available for spending on public services by the equivalent of about £260m per week (equivalent to about 9% of what we currently spend on the NHS). Which of these statements is closest to your view on this possible Brexit deal?
£260 million per week would be a price worth paying for this deal
£260 million per week would be too high a price for this deal

See About these data for possible variations

Topics

The Brexit process