Do you think that getting our post-Brexit arrangements right is more important than doing them quickly so a longer implementation period after 2020 would be acceptable, or that saying we needed a longer implementation period would just be an excuse for staying in the EU as long as possible and we should leave as currently planned?

Fieldwork dates: 29 May 2018 - 31 May 2018
Data from: Great Britain
Results from: 1 poll

Download
Results for: Do you think that getting our post-Brexit arrangements right is more important than doing them quickly so a longer implementation period after 2020 would be acceptable, or that saying we needed a longer implementation period would just be an excuse for staying in the EU as long as possible and we should leave as currently planned?
Fieldwork end date
Pollster
31 May 2018
Poll by Ashcroft
A longer implementation period after 2020 would be acceptable 45%
We should leave as currently planned 36%
Don't know 18%

Combine responses

Choose first group:
Choose second group:
Choose third group:

Poll details

Full question wording

As things stand the UK is due to leave the EU officially in March 2019. There will then be an "implementation period" of one year, during which the changes agreed in any Brexit deal would take effect. If the government were to say that some issues would take longer to resolve, and the "implementation period" therefore needed to last for a further two or three years after 2020 – during which the UK would still abide by EU regulations and customs rules – what would you think?

See About these data for possible variations