Question refers to the following arguments (set out earlier in questionnaire documentation):
FOR: 'We are stronger, better off and safer in Europe than we would be out on our own. Of course the EU isn't perfect but leaving Europe would risk our prosperity, threaten our safety and diminish our influence in the world. The benefits of being in clearly outweigh the costs: A stronger economy that delivers opportunity now and for future generations – opportunity through growth, trade, investment, jobs and lower prices. Stronger leadership on the world stage, enabling us to shape the future – influence through participation. Stronger security in a dangerous world, keeping Britain safe – safety though partnerships. To vote to remain part of Europe is to vote for a stronger, better off, safer Britain that delivers opportunity for individuals and families, now and in the future. To vote to leave is to take a leap into the unknown, risking a weaker economy, the prospects of future generations and a loss of influence on the world stage'.
AGAINST: 'The EU-funded campaign to stay inside the EU is led by the people who told us Britain would be doomed unless we ditched the pound. They've learned nothing from the disasters of the euro project and the inability of the EU to cope with the economic and technological forces changing the world. We need a new UK-EU relationship based on free trade and global networked cooperation so we can adapt fast to the forces that are undermining the EU's 1950s structure. The choice is clear. If you trust politicians and think Britain will be stronger if we keep giving more power and money to the EU as we have done for forty years, then you should vote 'remain'. If you think Britain will be stronger and safer if we end the supremacy of EU law, take back control, and can vote for the politicians who make our laws, then you should Vote Leave'.
